Mervyn Walter Mallard (1923-2001) seen here with his favourite beagle Cuvva in 1962 |
Ol’ dads can make their sons very proud sometimes.
There are
magic moments when something they say or do – sometimes both – can make an 11 year-old
feel like he’s in the company of a superhero.
These moments and the feelings
they evoke will stay with us until we’re ol’ dads ourselves, recounting stories
of the ‘olden days’ to our grandkids that will pass into family legend.
My ol’
dad was one such man and he left me with a wealth of stories that I cherish and
recount with great joy and pride to this day.
My ol’ dad was a toolmaker by trade, for whom precision was
both a religion and in his hands, an art form.
In his later years he turned his
hand to the gunsmith’s arts and in doing so turned me off shooting and onto
archery.
The thing is, by the time my ol’ dad got through bedding an action,
floating a barrel, tweaking a trigger, loaded the shells, honing the mounts and
mounted the scope, all of it had been done with such perfect precision that
failing to hit a bullseye was 100% down to human error, and who wants a rifle
that’s sole raison d’être is to make its owner look like a bloody idiot?
Bows, on the other-hand, are built with the obfuscation of incompetence
in mind – traditional bows doubly so.
There are all those wonderful vagaries
associated with the myriad types of wood that arrow shafts are available in,
and there’s the argy-bargy of conflicting opinion about what arrow spine is just
perfect for what draw weight and so on.
Then you
need to decide what types of feathers you’ll use – left or right-wing – and whether
it really matters as long as you don’t mix them.
Should you use parabolic or shield cut
feathers and of what length, and should they be attached straight along the
shaft with sinew, or are they best glued in place in a helical twist formation, and if
the latter, should it be a left or right helical.
Finally, if we ever manage to guess all that
stuff right with such consummate precision that we’re in imminent peril of
clevering ourselves right out of things to blame for the odd lousy shot, we
archers can always rely on the ever-present mitigating companion know as the “Archer’s Paradox” as an excuse – hallelujah!
The archer’s paradox is complicated science and, woe is me,
I was away they day they did science at school, but in a nutshell it goes
something like this.
When a wooden shaft is fired from a bow the stresses of
acceleration around the bow stave and through the air itself, results in the rear-end impatiently trying to accelerate faster
than the front-end.
Unfortunately, because the rear-end’s blinkers are out, it
can’t pull into the right-hand lane and overtake the front-end in an orderly
manner.
Instead it tries to overtake the front-end by passing through it.
Of
course this is not possible because of.....more science, and the result is a sort
of bumper-car effect without the bumps per se.
The rear pushes, and the front,
not being in any particular hurry to get out of its way, allows itself to be
pushed ever so slightly slower, while the bit in the middle, trying its level
best to maintain some semblance of decorum, bellies and twists as it takes the
brunt of all the resulting.…science.
The
end result when viewed via the wonders of modern slow-motion cinematography, is
an arrow that speeds determinedly towards its target in a sort of horizontal wriggling
action reminiscent of a piece of spaghetti sneezed from the nose of the only
animal with sinuses long enough to accommodate 28 inches of 5/16 diameter al
dente pasta i.e. a bemused giraffe.
My point is this; it’s really hard to turn a traditional bow
and arrow into a precision instrument in quite the same way one can tweak a
riffle and scope to deliver minute-of-angle accuracy.
As a result, when I miss
a target’s A-zone in competition, snagging a B-zone instead I simply examine
the recovered arrow and say, in learned and considered tones, “I’m not certain I’m entirely satisfied with
these new spruce shafts”.
This I could say safe in the knowledge that my buddies will reassure me that a B-zone shot in the field would mean fresh game on the table nonetheless, and that’s all that really counts.
This I could say safe in the knowledge that my buddies will reassure me that a B-zone shot in the field would mean fresh game on the table nonetheless, and that’s all that really counts.
But the fact is, I know that were he still with us today,
within a few hours of putting my bow and arrows in the hands of my ol’ dad, the
two would be working in such perfect harmony the Archery Alliance of
Australia would be holding crisis talks to institute a new zone in the centre
of the A-zone, which they would no-doubt christen the “bloody Mallard!” zone.
There was one occasion I remember very clearly, when my ol’
dad’s skill at tuning a rifle not only made me proud, but also made me realise
that, in the parlance of the 1960s, he was ‘way-cool’ too.
We were living in the suburbs of what was then Sydney’s
outskirts and we’d regularly pack-up the car and journey into dairy country to
shoot a few conies in a little one-horse farming community known as Camden.
My ol’ dad
would carry one of his numerous .22s, while the trusty Browning .22-short was
my rifle of choice and, coincidentally, the only rifle in my ‘collection’ at
the time.
I would come to refer to that old Browning as ‘Lightning’, not
because it was fast, but because like lightning it rarely hit the same spot
twice. That is, until my ol' dad got jack on me missin'!
One day we pulled up at the farmer’s gate in Camden and
while preparing our gear for the day ahead, another car arrived.
The driver saw
that we were also shooters and came over to introduce himself. A brief conversation
about which direction we were headed in and what time we planned to return to
our cars ensued, and it was decided that in the interests of safety all
shooting should cease promptly at 10am to allow both parties a safe return.
OH&S issues sorted, off we went to bag a bunny or three.
As we wandered off into the field I happened to glance back
to find the other hunter looking at us over his shoulder with a snug little
grin on his face.
I reported this observation to my ol’ dad who, completely unphased,
told me it was known as the ‘shotgun smirk’.
Apparently the shotgun smirk comes
with the purchase of expensive guns such as the Bentley centre-fire, and is pre-set
to leap from the breach onto the new owner’s face where it surgically implants
itself the very first time he manages to hit what he’d previously been unable
to hit with “a proper gun”.
The day was very productive. My ol’ dad took ten young
bunnies and as luck would have it, another two does whose Prozac scripts had
run out, very accommodatingly leaped in front of Lightning with suicide-aforethought.
With the freezer topped-up and the dogs
sorted with food for a few days, we headed back to the car to get stuck-into
the business of dressing the day’s take.
As prearranged we arrived back at the car just after 10am,
as did the Smirk to his credit, and as we searched the car for our field kits
the Smirk opened an old and bloodied sugar-bag and began laying out his day’s
take on a nearby fallen tree that had been used by generations of hunters as a
cleaning table.
Like my ol’ dad, the Smirk had taken a total of ten bunnies, which
he proceeded to lay out at strategic intervals calculated to impress.
Field
kits retrieved from the car, we proceeded to the same fallen tree and began to
set-up, and it was at this moment that the Smirk set in motion circumstances that
were about to make a little boy very proud of his ol’ dad.
“You were shooting
rabbits, then” inquired the Smirk?
“Yes, rabbits, that’s
right” replied my ol’ dad.
“Only, I don’t shoot rabbits
with a rifle. Rifles is for foxes and pigs and such” the Smirk informed
us.
“Oh really” said
my ol’ dad with a wry note of incredulity in his voice, “and why’s that” he inquired?
“Well, .22s leave
rabbits all bloody and bruised inside and no good for eating at all” said
the smirk, and as my ol’ dad pulled his ten young rabbits from his bag and laid
them out neatly on that fallen log, he calmly uttered the words that would burn
themselves indelibly into an 11 year-olds memory for life:
“Well yes, a .22 can
bruise them up a bit, you’ve got a point there…still, I don’t eat the heads!”
And there they were, ten bunnies every one of them taken cleanly
with a single shot just behind the ears.
To this day I cannot walk past a fallen tree without harking
back to the day my ol’ dad taught me two very important lessons;
1) the importance
of remaining calm when accosted by an idiot, and
2) the effectiveness of
understatement back-up by raw talent.
I miss my ol’ dad!
Anyway, I’ll get outaya way now...
©gmallard2016 all rights reserved
Follow the Hunters' Stand on Twitter @Hunters_Stand
If you'd like to share this post the link to cut & paste is http://thehunterstand.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/ol-dads-and-al-dente-paradox.html
For those wishing to leave comments either anonymously or under their own names (go-orn, I dares ya!), please select the 'Name/URL' option from the drop down menu beneath the comments section at the bottom of this page. You do not need to enter a URL.
If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com This service will not include notification of new comments.
All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.
Garry...
ReplyDeletethe lesson learnt clearly is that you cant put brains in bricks.
On a recent nights shooting with a friend I shot second.. and bagged 5 roos and a fox with head shots, some on the hop. My friend's only comment was "Shite... do you sleep with those rifles...."
Regards
Geoff Cook.
Hi Garry. Having read this the second time, I still really like your story. Regards Claudia Koelndorfer
ReplyDeleteforget the blog buddy, I get the feeling you've got more stories like this. write the book!
ReplyDeleteThat is great and has reminded me of some of the stories that my dad told me thank you.
ReplyDelete