GREENS OUTSOURCE HUNTFEST OPPOSITION

Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable! That was my reaction when I heard about the latest and most unethical (thus far) stunt pulled by HuntFest's antagonists.

The anti-HuntFest group S.A.F.E (Stop Arms Fairs in Eurobodalla) and their Greens' sponsors ran two petitions recently. The first found favour with only 191 signatories amongst the community.  Unsatisfied that this response adequately reflected their position that “the majority of Eurobodalla residents are opposed to HuntFest”, a SAFE supporter launched a second petition and opened it up to the entire population of the Milky Way Galaxy.

This petition did much better than the first. It garnered 40,000 signatures, the overwhelming majority of them – i.e. a reported minimum of 34,000 of the 40,000 – from outside Australia. But that didn't stop 50 victorious demonstrators handing it to Councillor Gabbie Harding (the Greens) as evidence that HuntFest must be denied its application for an amendment to its event licence.  

Who’d have thought people in Pakistan, Ethiopia and the People’s Republic of Donetsk would be so vehemently opposed to a hunting and outdoors expo in Narooma? More to the point, what sort of community group is ethically corrupt enough to hang its hat on such a stunt?

Let me tell you why not a single signature on that petition is relevant and I mean aside from the fact that all but a miniscule few have no stake in the debate.

The petition was promulgated overseas where people have no idea what HuntFest is about, how it is managed, where it will be held, what the laws are governing such events, what its purpose is, what Australian culture is like and how it differs from the big bad US culture. They know nothing about the nature of the community HuntFest is held in, nor do they know that SAFE seeks support overseas because it has none at home, etc etc. No one who signed the petition has any of this information. All those who signed the petition know about HuntFest is what the petitioners told them, and that information was neither accurate nor unbiased. They certainly did not put the alternative position to the world.

Now while it may be fair to say that petitions are always somewhat one-sided, it is usual practice to run them in the location in which they are relevant. People in Narooma, the Eurobodalla, or even Australia-wide may have a finger on the pulse of the HuntFest debate; they may even visit HuntFest, but people in Ethiopia, Russia and Bulgaria do not. Yet such people account for the overwhelming majority of those who want HuntFest stopped. Let's be clear about this....they know next to nothing about the event but they want it stopped.

That anyone would sign a petition of any kind without making themselves comprehensively familiar with its subject from all perspectives, speaks volumes about the irresponsible nature of the 34,000. They are no better than the millions of cause junkies who recently signed a petition to force Steven Spielberg to stop hunting dinosaurs to the brink of extinction.  Sane people the world over realised it was satire. Millions did not and the petition went viral, garnering not only millions of signatures but also some of the most violent and offensive commentary on the Jurassic Park director's ethics and character one could possibly imagine...all of them from pacifists and animal lovers of course. And all because they saw a picture of Steven Spielberg posing with a gun while leaning against a dead Tyrannosaurus Rex.  

It is a well known phenomenon exploited by the desperate and unethical.  The easily led, the feeble minded and the dis-empowered will sign any online petition as a means of feeling as though they have flexed their virtual-muscles and exercised some power and control over a world they feel increasingly impotent in.

The fact that SAFE and the GREENS would submit such a petition to Council demonstrates their contempt for the Eurobodalla community. It proves, conclusively, that the consultation process they incessantly whined they’d not had, was nothing more than a vexatious demand to waste ratepayers’ money, because when the community fails to support the Greens and SAFE, the Greens and SAFE simply ignore their wishes and go fishing for support in Taipei.

The Greens and SAFE display a contemptuous paternalism for their community that is really quite offensive. They believe they must protect the poor hicks from themselves and that without their enlightened guidance and firm hand the community will descend into a state of violent anarchy nourished by the various follies of its simple hayseed mentality.

Not only is it time to call an end to the stupidity of the anti-HuntFest lobby, it is also time to rethink whether there is any room on Council for a representative who’d support a tactic that is so blatantly manipulative and disrespectful that it beggars belief.

The latest episode of the grand deception can be seen as it unfolds on WIN TV

Interestingly, Councillor Harding (The Greens) claims that HuntFest originally started out as a photographic and DVD competition and now, with an application lodged to include the sale of guns and ammunition, the event has changed from what was originally proposed.  It is strange that Councillor Harding would think this an odd state of affairs.  Many events commence as quite small affairs and with time change in response to consumer consultation.

It is when the scope and nature of endeavours do not change in response to stakeholder feedback, that they stagnate and die e.g. the Greens as a relevant political force in Australia.

The latest petition was presented to Councilor Harding by her co-conspirators with surgical precision and TV cameras rolling. What was not made clear was the fact that while the petition certainly carried many thousands of international signatories, it garnered precious little local support. 

As the image below shows, SAFE closed its local petition on October 6th 2014, by which time it had garnered the support of a measly 191 signatories, a considerable number of whom were not Eurobodalla or Narooma residents. 

They had demanded community consultation and the process had run its course. Faced with irrefutable evidence that the Greens and SAFE have an abysmal level of support for their 'sky is falling, we'll all be rooned' motif,  they had no choice but to switch to Plan B aimed at baffling the community with sheer numbers.

Of course had HuntFest's organisers been unprincipled souls, they too may have gone a-hunting for support overseas. Given the resurgence in hunting and target shooting activities the world over, it doubtless would have taken no time at all to secure 2million signatures or more. But had they done this, the Greens and SAFE would have been the first to cry foul claiming all manner of dark deals had been done with the "powerful US gun lobby" they see behind every corner and in every shadowy recess. 

One wonders how many of the people who signed SAFE's petition were members of 'People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' (PETA), an organisation vehemently opposed to guns and hunting, a registered domestic terrorist agency in the US and carefully scrutinised in Australia? 

HuntFest began with modest objectives, as a photographic competition/exhibition and outdoors expo. It included displays and sales of outdoors and camping equipment, food and drink and so on. All the stuff you'll see at any outdoors expo. The Greens and SAFE opposed it.

The following year, based on feedback from its many supportive participants, HuntFest applied for a variation to its event licence that would permit the display of legal firearms and ammunition in order that the event might grow and continue to inject money into the economy. The Greens and SAFE opposed it.

In 2014, again in response to visitor consultation and feedback, HuntFest has applied for a variation to its event licence that would permit the sale of legal firearms and ammunition, thus growing the event in the hope of injecting even more money into the local economy than the $900,000 it brought to the area in 2014. Guess what....the Greens and SAFE oppose it.

The Greens and SAFE will continue to oppose HuntFest because it represents and aims to preserve an Australian tradition and culture they do not care for or respect. Yes, hunting is very much an Australian tradition and in fact one of the few traditions European Australians share in common with first nations Australians. For this very rare cultural nexus alone Australia's hunting traditions are worthy of respect, recognition and preservation.

Those who support the Greens' and SAFE's many and various intolerant petitions should be regarded in the same manner as members of the community who'd sign a "No to gay marriage!" or "No to Muslims in Narooma!" petition.  Such people do exist in the Eurobodalla. They are perhaps even more numerous than the anti-HuntFest lobby and doubtless if they launched a noxious petition internationally they too could produce 400,000 signatories or more in support of their bigotry, all of which I hope we would treat with the contempt they deserve. 

There are a number of simple facts that SAFE and the Greens have gone to great pains to keep from the community or indeed have striven to misrepresent in order to engender fear and hatred.

• HuntFest is not an "arms fair". This term has been seized upon in order to spread panic. HuntFest is a combination of hunting and outdoors expo and photographic exhibition.
  
  The term "arms fair" applies only to the permit required from the NSW Police Minister in order to sell legal firearms and ammunition at a temporary venue. This is a very small part of what HuntFest is about.  To call HuntFest an "arms fair" because it carries a permit of that name is like calling the annual Bega Show a liquor store or a pub because it must carry a liquor licence to sell beer at the bar 3 days a year.
  
  SAFE and the Greens are using the term "arms fair" in much the same way people once strove to make AIDS synonymous with the gay community, to demonise people and a lifestyle they do not approve of. It's as simple as that!

• HuntFest is not a "US style arms fair". This again is an effort to employ a bigoted epithet in order to create fear and loathing in the community.
  
  The Greens' and SAFE's own paraphernalia clearly exhibits a loathing of all things American. For instance they are continually telling us we do not want to go down the path of America.  They use the "American guns culture" catchcry because they want you to hear the words "HuntFest" and "arms fair" and immediately conjure images of surface to air missiles, anti-personnel mines, machine guns and Uzis, Lars Rockets and laser guided missiles, tanks and stealth aircraft.  All these things may indeed be available at a "US-style arms fair" but they can never be sold at HuntFest.
  
  To sell or even to display such items requires a Prohibited Arms Fair Permit. HuntFest does NOT have one. HuntFest will NEVER apply for one. HuntFest could NEVER be granted one in Narooma. 
  
  Quite aside from the fact that no-one would travel to the boonies to shop for a thermonuclear warhead or a Star Wars satellite, I'm reliably advised that the premises one must have access to in order to obtain a Prohibited Arms Fair Permit do not exist anywhere on the far south coast. However, that will not stop SAFE claiming that is HuntFest's ultimate objective, just you wait and see. 

• The amendments HuntFest has sought to its event licence will enable it to sell nothing during those two short days in June that cannot be purchased every day at sports & recreation, camping & outdoors centres in neighbouring shires. These items are legal and in fact they are essential tools of the land that Eurobodalla farmers, unlike farmers in all other NSW shires, cannot readily purchase.

•  SAFE has claimed that it is not necessary to sell guns and ammunition at HuntFest or anywhere else in the Eurobodalla because they may be purchased over the internet. This is false! It is illegal to deal in firearms and ammunition in this manner.

• No one can't just mosey into HuntFest, hand over some cash and walk out with a gun.  In order to acquire a gun in NSW one must first posses a NSW firearms licence. One must then complete a form known as a Permit to Acquire a Firearm (PTA form), in which one identifies the type of firearm sought, how it will be secured and sundry other details. Once lodged with the NSW Firearms Registry the PTA is subject to a cooling off period, after which the PTA may be issued. This authorised PTA form must then be presented to the point of sale.  HuntFest is only open to the public for 2 days!
  
  The purchase or disposal of any firearm must be conducted by a licensed NSW Firearms Dealer.

• In 2014 HuntFest brought an estimated $900,000 to the community during the off season. Events of a similar nature held elsewhere bring far greater sums to their community as they prosper and grow. Hunting contributed $439million to the Victorian economy in 2013 and created 3500 full time jobs.
  
  HuntFest's organisers would like to bring some measure of this prosperity to Narooma and the Eurobodalla. What's more, they have striven to do it at absolutely no cost to Council or the community.  If the organisers' efforts to contribute to the recovery of a once prosperous local economy are thwarted by political cowardice, local people, especially businesses, are certain to make their disappointment clear at the polls. 

• While HuntFest contributes to the community's prosperity, SAFE and the Greens continue to drain Council's coffers with vexatious complaints and stunts, all of which take up time that is paid for by the ratepayer. It has been estimated that opposition to HuntFest has already cost the ratepayer in excess of $100,000 and delayed a great deal of important Council business. Council will soon apply to introduce another rate increase because it just can't make ends meet on its current income. Remember SAFE and the Greens when your rates go up.

• The suggestion that hunters "kill for fun" is an emotive manipulative construct of the ignorant anti-hunter. The objective of the claim is to promote community hatred and opposition to the hunters' culture and lifestyle. The Greens and their groups claim to stand for peace and unity. In reality they promote hatred, intolerance, disdain antagonism and division in the community in order to marginalise all who oppose them.
  
  Those interested in learning a little about the real reasons people hunt, may be interested in the article Killing for kicks.

• Hunting is cruel. This claim is also made to drive the public into a frenzy of emotion and hatred. Death in nature is always cruel. There are no exceptions to this rule for all the reasons outlined in The gaping wound in the cruelty argument also on this site.  When an animal in the wild reaches the end of its span, the best it can home for is that the agony nature inflicts will not last too long. Creatures waiting to feast on a carcass will not wait until death before tucking in.
  
  The hunters' obligation is to strive to ensure that s/he inflicts no more inhumane a death than that which mother nature inevitably has in store.  The vast majority of hunters uphold this obligation and they respect and appreciate the life they take to sustain their own.  They are honoured to be a part of and subject to the eternal struggle, rather than mere observers.

In the final analysis it is not for the community to make thousands of submissions to prove HuntFest has its support. Anyone who has conducted consultation processes knows that people will not rally to support things they do not object to.  Fervent objections are nourished and powered by fear, anger and hatred, which SAFE and the Greens have in spades. Less volatile, more reasoned people in the community will be wondering what the fuss is all about. They will be rolling their eyes at SAFE's antics and facepalming each time they hear yet another Greens rant in the "you'll all be sorry when the world ends" motif. 

Their petition of 191 signatures about sums up their support-base and given that the Eurobodalla's population is around 37,000 souls, that result proves one thing beyond doubt. It proves that 36,809 residents did not sign the petition. Likewise in the case of Council's submissions process, if 200 submissions opposing HuntFest were received, it is certain that 36,800 residents are not concerned enough to make a submission.  This is the logic Council is obligated to apply to the process. 

The rules of Council's submissions process put hunters and firearms owners at a distinct disadvantage from the outset. Hunters and firearms owners are responsible people with a clear moral and legal obligation to ensure they do nothing to compromise the security of their firearms. Yet Council demanded that people include their full name and address with each submission, thus creating a list of addresses of all the firearms owners in the Shire. With theft one of the main means by which criminals obtain guns, firearms owners are ever reluctant to assist naive agencies to make shopping lists for the underworld that may be available for scrutiny by who knows whom. 

Still, I am confident that HuntFest will get the go-ahead to grow just as it should. Its organisers are not planning anything that breaches the law of the land and that should be the only issue under consideration. If a sports store were to open in the main street of Narooma, it should be permitted to sell a comprehensive array of sporting equipment, including legal guns, bows and ammunition just as stores do in less intolerant shires and towns. If the Greens and SAFE don't approve of the law, their course is clear. Rather than attempting to infect the law-abiding citizens of their community with the virus of hatred and bigotry, they should lobby the law makers for change. 

Anyway, I'll get outaya way now....

Update: Councillors' opinions regarding the petition's relevance to the debate have been sought by the Bay Post

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com  This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.