GREENS OUTSOURCE HUNTFEST OPPOSITION

Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable! That was my reaction when I heard about the latest and most unethical (thus far) stunt pulled by HuntFest's antagonists.

The anti-HuntFest group S.A.F.E (Stop Arms Fairs in Eurobodalla) and their Greens' sponsors ran two petitions recently. The first found favour with only 191 signatories amongst the community.  Unsatisfied that this response adequately reflected their position that “the majority of Eurobodalla residents are opposed to HuntFest”, a SAFE supporter launched a second petition and opened it up to the entire population of the Milky Way Galaxy.

This petition did much better than the first. It garnered 40,000 signatures, the overwhelming majority of them – i.e. a reported minimum of 34,000 of the 40,000 – from outside Australia. But that didn't stop 50 victorious demonstrators handing it to Councillor Gabbie Harding (the Greens) as evidence that HuntFest must be denied its application for an amendment to its event licence.  

Who’d have thought people in Pakistan, Ethiopia and the People’s Republic of Donetsk would be so vehemently opposed to a hunting and outdoors expo in Narooma? More to the point, what sort of community group is ethically corrupt enough to hang its hat on such a stunt?

Let me tell you why not a single signature on that petition is relevant and I mean aside from the fact that all but a miniscule few have no stake in the debate.

The petition was promulgated overseas where people have no idea what HuntFest is about, how it is managed, where it will be held, what the laws are governing such events, what its purpose is, what Australian culture is like and how it differs from the big bad US culture. They know nothing about the nature of the community HuntFest is held in, nor do they know that SAFE seeks support overseas because it has none at home, etc etc. No one who signed the petition has any of this information. All those who signed the petition know about HuntFest is what the petitioners told them, and that information was neither accurate nor unbiased. They certainly did not put the alternative position to the world.

Now while it may be fair to say that petitions are always somewhat one-sided, it is usual practice to run them in the location in which they are relevant. People in Narooma, the Eurobodalla, or even Australia-wide may have a finger on the pulse of the HuntFest debate; they may even visit HuntFest, but people in Ethiopia, Russia and Bulgaria do not. Yet such people account for the overwhelming majority of those who want HuntFest stopped. Let's be clear about this....they know next to nothing about the event but they want it stopped.

That anyone would sign a petition of any kind without making themselves comprehensively familiar with its subject from all perspectives, speaks volumes about the irresponsible nature of the 34,000. They are no better than the millions of cause junkies who recently signed a petition to force Steven Spielberg to stop hunting dinosaurs to the brink of extinction.  Sane people the world over realised it was satire. Millions did not and the petition went viral, garnering not only millions of signatures but also some of the most violent and offensive commentary on the Jurassic Park director's ethics and character one could possibly imagine...all of them from pacifists and animal lovers of course. And all because they saw a picture of Steven Spielberg posing with a gun while leaning against a dead Tyrannosaurus Rex.  

It is a well known phenomenon exploited by the desperate and unethical.  The easily led, the feeble minded and the dis-empowered will sign any online petition as a means of feeling as though they have flexed their virtual-muscles and exercised some power and control over a world they feel increasingly impotent in.

The fact that SAFE and the GREENS would submit such a petition to Council demonstrates their contempt for the Eurobodalla community. It proves, conclusively, that the consultation process they incessantly whined they’d not had, was nothing more than a vexatious demand to waste ratepayers’ money, because when the community fails to support the Greens and SAFE, the Greens and SAFE simply ignore their wishes and go fishing for support in Taipei.

The Greens and SAFE display a contemptuous paternalism for their community that is really quite offensive. They believe they must protect the poor hicks from themselves and that without their enlightened guidance and firm hand the community will descend into a state of violent anarchy nourished by the various follies of its simple hayseed mentality.

Not only is it time to call an end to the stupidity of the anti-HuntFest lobby, it is also time to rethink whether there is any room on Council for a representative who’d support a tactic that is so blatantly manipulative and disrespectful that it beggars belief.

The latest episode of the grand deception can be seen as it unfolds on WIN TV

Interestingly, Councillor Harding (The Greens) claims that HuntFest originally started out as a photographic and DVD competition and now, with an application lodged to include the sale of guns and ammunition, the event has changed from what was originally proposed.  It is strange that Councillor Harding would think this an odd state of affairs.  Many events commence as quite small affairs and with time change in response to consumer consultation.

It is when the scope and nature of endeavours do not change in response to stakeholder feedback, that they stagnate and die e.g. the Greens as a relevant political force in Australia.

The latest petition was presented to Councilor Harding by her co-conspirators with surgical precision and TV cameras rolling. What was not made clear was the fact that while the petition certainly carried many thousands of international signatories, it garnered precious little local support. 

As the image below shows, SAFE closed its local petition on October 6th 2014, by which time it had garnered the support of a measly 191 signatories, a considerable number of whom were not Eurobodalla or Narooma residents. 

They had demanded community consultation and the process had run its course. Faced with irrefutable evidence that the Greens and SAFE have an abysmal level of support for their 'sky is falling, we'll all be rooned' motif,  they had no choice but to switch to Plan B aimed at baffling the community with sheer numbers.

Of course had HuntFest's organisers been unprincipled souls, they too may have gone a-hunting for support overseas. Given the resurgence in hunting and target shooting activities the world over, it doubtless would have taken no time at all to secure 2million signatures or more. But had they done this, the Greens and SAFE would have been the first to cry foul claiming all manner of dark deals had been done with the "powerful US gun lobby" they see behind every corner and in every shadowy recess. 

One wonders how many of the people who signed SAFE's petition were members of 'People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' (PETA), an organisation vehemently opposed to guns and hunting, a registered domestic terrorist agency in the US and carefully scrutinised in Australia? 

HuntFest began with modest objectives, as a photographic competition/exhibition and outdoors expo. It included displays and sales of outdoors and camping equipment, food and drink and so on. All the stuff you'll see at any outdoors expo. The Greens and SAFE opposed it.

The following year, based on feedback from its many supportive participants, HuntFest applied for a variation to its event licence that would permit the display of legal firearms and ammunition in order that the event might grow and continue to inject money into the economy. The Greens and SAFE opposed it.

In 2014, again in response to visitor consultation and feedback, HuntFest has applied for a variation to its event licence that would permit the sale of legal firearms and ammunition, thus growing the event in the hope of injecting even more money into the local economy than the $900,000 it brought to the area in 2014. Guess what....the Greens and SAFE oppose it.

The Greens and SAFE will continue to oppose HuntFest because it represents and aims to preserve an Australian tradition and culture they do not care for or respect. Yes, hunting is very much an Australian tradition and in fact one of the few traditions European Australians share in common with first nations Australians. For this very rare cultural nexus alone Australia's hunting traditions are worthy of respect, recognition and preservation.

Those who support the Greens' and SAFE's many and various intolerant petitions should be regarded in the same manner as members of the community who'd sign a "No to gay marriage!" or "No to Muslims in Narooma!" petition.  Such people do exist in the Eurobodalla. They are perhaps even more numerous than the anti-HuntFest lobby and doubtless if they launched a noxious petition internationally they too could produce 400,000 signatories or more in support of their bigotry, all of which I hope we would treat with the contempt they deserve. 

There are a number of simple facts that SAFE and the Greens have gone to great pains to keep from the community or indeed have striven to misrepresent in order to engender fear and hatred.

• HuntFest is not an "arms fair". This term has been seized upon in order to spread panic. HuntFest is a combination of hunting and outdoors expo and photographic exhibition.
  
  The term "arms fair" applies only to the permit required from the NSW Police Minister in order to sell legal firearms and ammunition at a temporary venue. This is a very small part of what HuntFest is about.  To call HuntFest an "arms fair" because it carries a permit of that name is like calling the annual Bega Show a liquor store or a pub because it must carry a liquor licence to sell beer at the bar 3 days a year.
  
  SAFE and the Greens are using the term "arms fair" in much the same way people once strove to make AIDS synonymous with the gay community, to demonise people and a lifestyle they do not approve of. It's as simple as that!

• HuntFest is not a "US style arms fair". This again is an effort to employ a bigoted epithet in order to create fear and loathing in the community.
  
  The Greens' and SAFE's own paraphernalia clearly exhibits a loathing of all things American. For instance they are continually telling us we do not want to go down the path of America.  They use the "American guns culture" catchcry because they want you to hear the words "HuntFest" and "arms fair" and immediately conjure images of surface to air missiles, anti-personnel mines, machine guns and Uzis, Lars Rockets and laser guided missiles, tanks and stealth aircraft.  All these things may indeed be available at a "US-style arms fair" but they can never be sold at HuntFest.
  
  To sell or even to display such items requires a Prohibited Arms Fair Permit. HuntFest does NOT have one. HuntFest will NEVER apply for one. HuntFest could NEVER be granted one in Narooma. 
  
  Quite aside from the fact that no-one would travel to the boonies to shop for a thermonuclear warhead or a Star Wars satellite, I'm reliably advised that the premises one must have access to in order to obtain a Prohibited Arms Fair Permit do not exist anywhere on the far south coast. However, that will not stop SAFE claiming that is HuntFest's ultimate objective, just you wait and see. 

• The amendments HuntFest has sought to its event licence will enable it to sell nothing during those two short days in June that cannot be purchased every day at sports & recreation, camping & outdoors centres in neighbouring shires. These items are legal and in fact they are essential tools of the land that Eurobodalla farmers, unlike farmers in all other NSW shires, cannot readily purchase.

•  SAFE has claimed that it is not necessary to sell guns and ammunition at HuntFest or anywhere else in the Eurobodalla because they may be purchased over the internet. This is false! It is illegal to deal in firearms and ammunition in this manner.

• No one can't just mosey into HuntFest, hand over some cash and walk out with a gun.  In order to acquire a gun in NSW one must first posses a NSW firearms licence. One must then complete a form known as a Permit to Acquire a Firearm (PTA form), in which one identifies the type of firearm sought, how it will be secured and sundry other details. Once lodged with the NSW Firearms Registry the PTA is subject to a cooling off period, after which the PTA may be issued. This authorised PTA form must then be presented to the point of sale.  HuntFest is only open to the public for 2 days!
  
  The purchase or disposal of any firearm must be conducted by a licensed NSW Firearms Dealer.

• In 2014 HuntFest brought an estimated $900,000 to the community during the off season. Events of a similar nature held elsewhere bring far greater sums to their community as they prosper and grow. Hunting contributed $439million to the Victorian economy in 2013 and created 3500 full time jobs.
  
  HuntFest's organisers would like to bring some measure of this prosperity to Narooma and the Eurobodalla. What's more, they have striven to do it at absolutely no cost to Council or the community.  If the organisers' efforts to contribute to the recovery of a once prosperous local economy are thwarted by political cowardice, local people, especially businesses, are certain to make their disappointment clear at the polls. 

• While HuntFest contributes to the community's prosperity, SAFE and the Greens continue to drain Council's coffers with vexatious complaints and stunts, all of which take up time that is paid for by the ratepayer. It has been estimated that opposition to HuntFest has already cost the ratepayer in excess of $100,000 and delayed a great deal of important Council business. Council will soon apply to introduce another rate increase because it just can't make ends meet on its current income. Remember SAFE and the Greens when your rates go up.

• The suggestion that hunters "kill for fun" is an emotive manipulative construct of the ignorant anti-hunter. The objective of the claim is to promote community hatred and opposition to the hunters' culture and lifestyle. The Greens and their groups claim to stand for peace and unity. In reality they promote hatred, intolerance, disdain antagonism and division in the community in order to marginalise all who oppose them.
  
  Those interested in learning a little about the real reasons people hunt, may be interested in the article Killing for kicks.

• Hunting is cruel. This claim is also made to drive the public into a frenzy of emotion and hatred. Death in nature is always cruel. There are no exceptions to this rule for all the reasons outlined in The gaping wound in the cruelty argument also on this site.  When an animal in the wild reaches the end of its span, the best it can home for is that the agony nature inflicts will not last too long. Creatures waiting to feast on a carcass will not wait until death before tucking in.
  
  The hunters' obligation is to strive to ensure that s/he inflicts no more inhumane a death than that which mother nature inevitably has in store.  The vast majority of hunters uphold this obligation and they respect and appreciate the life they take to sustain their own.  They are honoured to be a part of and subject to the eternal struggle, rather than mere observers.

In the final analysis it is not for the community to make thousands of submissions to prove HuntFest has its support. Anyone who has conducted consultation processes knows that people will not rally to support things they do not object to.  Fervent objections are nourished and powered by fear, anger and hatred, which SAFE and the Greens have in spades. Less volatile, more reasoned people in the community will be wondering what the fuss is all about. They will be rolling their eyes at SAFE's antics and facepalming each time they hear yet another Greens rant in the "you'll all be sorry when the world ends" motif. 

Their petition of 191 signatures about sums up their support-base and given that the Eurobodalla's population is around 37,000 souls, that result proves one thing beyond doubt. It proves that 36,809 residents did not sign the petition. Likewise in the case of Council's submissions process, if 200 submissions opposing HuntFest were received, it is certain that 36,800 residents are not concerned enough to make a submission.  This is the logic Council is obligated to apply to the process. 

The rules of Council's submissions process put hunters and firearms owners at a distinct disadvantage from the outset. Hunters and firearms owners are responsible people with a clear moral and legal obligation to ensure they do nothing to compromise the security of their firearms. Yet Council demanded that people include their full name and address with each submission, thus creating a list of addresses of all the firearms owners in the Shire. With theft one of the main means by which criminals obtain guns, firearms owners are ever reluctant to assist naive agencies to make shopping lists for the underworld that may be available for scrutiny by who knows whom. 

Still, I am confident that HuntFest will get the go-ahead to grow just as it should. Its organisers are not planning anything that breaches the law of the land and that should be the only issue under consideration. If a sports store were to open in the main street of Narooma, it should be permitted to sell a comprehensive array of sporting equipment, including legal guns, bows and ammunition just as stores do in less intolerant shires and towns. If the Greens and SAFE don't approve of the law, their course is clear. Rather than attempting to infect the law-abiding citizens of their community with the virus of hatred and bigotry, they should lobby the law makers for change. 

Anyway, I'll get outaya way now....

Update: Councillors' opinions regarding the petition's relevance to the debate have been sought by the Bay Post

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com  This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.

THE HUNTERS WAY (POEM)

Did you ever waken early, in the newborn frosted light,
Hear stones a-tumbling in a creek and Wonga take to flight.


Did you ever wrap your hands around a tin-cup to keep warm,
As you watched the mist that rises over wetlands with the dawn.

Did you ever sit on mossy ground, your back against a tree, 
And marvel there for hours, at all that you could see.

Breezes rippling through tall grasses, clouds that gather on the hills,
Wedge-tails spiralling for hours, Peewees bombing them for thrills.

Have you seen the blacksnake basking, in the first light of the day,
Have you smiled at little piles of thorns, that waddle ‘cross your way.

And when you knelt to drink your fill, from a pristine mountain stream,
Did you see the hunter looking back, unshaven tall and lean.

Did you recognise his hunger, did you question his right to kill,
Should you linger any longer, is his prey’s blood yours to spill.

And somewhere half detected in the corner of your eye,
Was your father’s face reflected, framed by a clear blue sky.

Did you feel him squeeze your shoulder, gently ruffle-up your hair,
With the shadows growing longer, were you sure you felt him there.

All the hunting yarns he’d told, were they echoed on the breeze,
Did the hunter’s arm enfold you, and put your doubts at ease.

Yes you feel the link eternal, that courses through your veins,
And you hear the ancient echoes, in the valleys hills and plains.

'Twas a sacred ageless legacy that drew you here this day,
And you’ll walk this land with honour, for that’s the hunters’ way.

- G. Mallard 2014

Follow the Hunters' Stand on Twitter @Hunters_Stand

If you'd like to share this post the link to cut & paste is http://thehunterstand.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/the-hunters-way-poem.html

For those wishing to leave comments either anonymously or under their own names (go-orn, I dares ya!), please select the 'Name/URL' option from the drop down menu beneath the comments section at the bottom of this page. You do not need to enter a URL.

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com This service will not include notification of new comments. 

All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.

KILLING FOR KICKS

As a lifelong hunter and environmentalist I find few claims more offensive than those suggesting hunters “kill animals for fun”, or derive pleasure from killing. That anyone might think hunting is about killing betrays a breathtaking level of ignorance. 

It is disingenuous to claim hunters do not enjoy hunting; of cause they do, but killing accounts for a nanosecond of the long and highly disciplined process dedicated and responsible outdoors-men and women call hunting.  It is the moment when the trigger is squeezed or the string loosed, and while it is likely the hunter is experiencing an adrenalin surge at this moment, few if any would interpret that sensation as ‘fun’. 

In fact, upon approaching game which has been successfully and swiftly brought down, hunters often report experiencing a profound feeling of reverence for the quarry, accompanied by a sense of sorrow and regret.  I have even seen a hunter’s eyes well-up with tears as a result of the emotional response commonly known as “hunter’s remorse”.

To reduce hunting to the instant of the kill is like attempting to convey the nature of chess by describing mate. But nor is it appropriate or accurate to describe hunting in grandiose terms as some noble contest between man and his prey. 

Hunting is certainly a contest, but it will perhaps surprise some to learn that for the most part it is a contest between the hunter and himself.

The hunt begins long before the hunter sallies forth into the field, camo-clad, bow or gun in hand.  Hunters spend inordinate amounts of time practicing to become as proficient as possible in their discipline. They’ll tune, retune and fine-tune firearms and bows. They’ll research the characteristics or various loads and projectiles to ensure a swift and humane kill. They’ll study the habits of their quarry with a commitment to detail bordering on obsession, and they’ll pore over maps studying terrains in an attempt to identify areas of likely interest to the quarry.

When finally in the field the hunter will check the terrain again, not only looking for signs of the quarry’s activity but also signs of recent human activity in the area. Once camp is set up he’ll check his arms to ensure they've not suffered for the jostling received on rough roads. After dinner when it’s dark and everything else is done, he might make his way to the top of a nearby ridge and with his binoculars, search for campfires below that betray the presence of other forest users.

All these activities are part of the hunt.

The hunter will go to bed early in preparation for an early start.  In the morning, after pouring coffee from a thermos made the night before so’s not to fill the damp morning air with the pungent scent of smoke, he’ll run through final equipment and supply checks before setting off into the field proper.

Now is the time of the ‘quickening’; that heightened state of awareness and closeness to the environment that draws so many to the hunters’ way of life. It’s marked by a hyper-sensitivity to movement, sound, sign and scent and it is in this state that the hunter will walk like a ghost for hours, making as little impact on the environment as possible.

The quickening is not driven by adrenalin, though it too may course through the hunters’ veins.  Rather, it is the product of a falling away of all the contrived complexities of modern life, to be replaced by a state of self-reliance the hunter longs to feel in common with those ancestors who’s attempts to convey the selfsame feelings of oneness with the environment were inscribed on cave walls by an ancient firelight.

The hunter does not walk the landscape as though its sole purpose were to entertain some ascended almost godlike creature that no longer considers itself to be subject to its caprices. The hunter immerses himself in the role that nature, with tens of thousands of years of evolutionary rehearsal, has cast him in. 

He wishes not simply to pass through, but to be subject to his environment.

This is the primary distinction between the hunter and the bushwalker. While the bushwalker may be able to appreciate the wondrous diversity and beauty of creation, he has also removed himself from it to a large extent, considering his role as that of benign caretaker or observer rather than a participant subject to nature’s eternal life and death struggles. 

The bushwalker and the hunter see the landscape through different lenses. One will view it from the path, seeing only that part of the landscape that dwells close to the path, while the other views the path only as a means of travelling deep into the landscape where he may leave the path behind to see what lies beyond.

The hunter is conscious of his every step. He feels the gentle roll of the earth from heel to toe underfoot. He feels the sharpness of a well-worn ridge trail through the soles of his boots and the spongy dampness of cool mosses on the valley floor, filled with twigs that may bend silently or snap with a silence-shattering crack depending on recent rainfall.

He knows the sound of the stone that tumbles dislodged from its resting place of a thousand years as he climbs an outcrop in search of a vantage point and he curses himself as it seems that stone will tumble down-hill through the scrub forever.

The hunter has sat in silence for long hours, his back against a tree, just thinking about life and the eternal verities as he looks out across bogs or lush fields well away from the beaten track. 

He has seen the sun rise and set over dry hills and across the valley floor, its passage marked by the chorus of one-hundred-thousand frogs. 

He has watched calmly as snakes slither across his path, he has watched the complex courtship rituals of birds while still others make frantic trips to and from nests to feed demanding young.

He has observed with wonder, the elaborate shapes of tiny orchids that grow and flower at his feet. He has seen the myriad varieties of tiny fungi that grow in the leaf-mold at the foot of ancient trees and he has sat perfectly still as cheeky skinks climb upon his boots to catch the sun’s first rays.

And because he travels in silence and well away from the tourist trails, he also observes another common occurrence in the bush; he observes death. 

He sees one beautiful creature killing another for survival, without guilt or malice. He sees where Death has walked across the landscape leaving bones to bleach in the sun, or perhaps just some feathers or a little fur to mark its path.

Sometimes the hunter comes across a creature too old and tired even to run; perhaps a roo just laying in the cool shade beneath a tree, hoping that Death will come swiftly and without too much torment, as a dozen opportunistic predators lay in wait close by. They'll not wait for Death to come before moving in. They’ll simply wait for their prey to give-in to the inevitable before their work begins.

Death is everywhere in the bush, just as life is everywhere and hunters appreciate this better than most. Not because they're harbingers of death themselves, but because their silent journeys off the beaten track make them witness to it more often that most forest users.

But the hunter's ultimate objective is to successfully stalk and kill his quarry and through this process he walks shoulder-to-shoulder with innumerable generations of hunters who've walked his path before.

Unlike so many of his harshest critics the hunter will take personal responsibility for the life he ends and will ultimately consume.

He will kill his quarry, bleed it, dress it in the field, remove its antlers, roll-up its hide and put its flesh in his backpack and he will carry the burden back to camp with the image of his quarry’s final moments of life at the forefront of his mind all the way. 

He will see the beast in his mind's eye. He will analyse the image over and over and in doing so he will venerate the beast for the gift of life its death has provided.

The ultimate in free-range organic meat will be eaten by the hunter and his family. The hide will be tanned and put to practical use and the antlers will be prepared for hafting onto blades and other tools, or perhaps carved into intricate works of folk art that communicate some aspect of the hunt to future generations.

The true hunter does not kill for kicks or thrills. It is participation in the hunt that evokes joy and satisfaction, not the nanosecond it takes to seduce his quarry with the hunter's kiss. 

He is engaged in a love-affair with nature and tradition; with moments spent in the role nature has cast his ancestors in for eons.  It's a role he challenges himself to recall by instinct and play with passion, dignity and respect.

Anyway, I'll get outaya way now....

The Hunters' Way

Did you ever waken early, in the newborn frosted light,
Hear stones a-tumbling in a creek and Wonga take to flight.
Did you ever wrap your hands around a tin-cup to keep warm,
As you watched the mist that rises over wetlands with the dawn.

Did you ever sit on mossy ground, your back against a tree,
And marvel there for hours, at all that you could see.
Breezes rippling through tall grasses, clouds that gather on the hills,
Wedge-tails spiralling for hours, Peewees bombing them for thrills.

Have you seen the blacksnake basking, in the first light of the day,
Have you smiled at little piles of thorns, that waddle ‘cross your way.
And when you knelt to drink your fill, from a pristine mountain stream,
Did you see the hunter looking back, unshaven tall and lean.

Did you recognise his hunger, did you question his right to kill,
Should you linger any longer, is his prey’s blood yours to spill.
And somewhere half detected in the corner of your eye,
Was your father’s face reflected, framed by a clear blue sky.

Did you feel him squeeze your shoulder, gently ruffle-up your hair,
With the shadows growing longer, were you sure you felt him there.
All the hunting yarns he’d told, were they echoed on the breeze,
Did the hunter’s arm enfold you, and put your doubts at ease.

Yes you feel the link eternal, that courses through your veins,
And you hear the ancient echoes, in the valleys hills and plains.
T’was a sacred ageless legacy that drew you here this day,
And you’ll walk this land with honour, for that’s the hunters’ way.

- G. Mallard 2013

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.

. 

HUNTING PART OF EVERYDAY LIFE ON THE LAND

The following opinion piece was written in response to a letter to the Editor entitled "Gun Culture", published in the Bega District News on August 29, 2014.

 

Hunting part of everyday life on the land

By Garry Mallard

The Bega District News et alii

Tuesday, September 16th, 2014

Once again Susan Cruttenden, as spokesperson for her Greens-nurtured political lobby group ‘S.A.F.E.’, has seen fit to openly pronounce the contempt with which she and her colleagues view their community.

In a nutshell, Ms Cruttended claims that exposure to the killing of animals, such as may be witnessed on a family hunting trip, desensitises young minds to violence, potentially turning them to a life of mayhem.

To justify her claims Ms Cruttenden quotes, or should I say she cherry-picks, a study that dealt with violent imagery on television, in the movies and in video games. The study ostensibly concluded that prolonged exposure may cause developmental delays in those areas of the brain responsible for limiting violent behaviour and impulse control.

Ms Cruttenden says that if the study has proven that viewing such material inhibits the growth of the brain’s frontal lobes, how much more damage must fragile young minds sustain as a result of helping daddy kill a deer or a wild dog.

Ms Cruttenden, the men and women who, for generations, have worked the land and tirelessly built the community you live in, routinely kill animals.  It is part of the everyday business of working the land. They slaughter animals for meat; they shoot them for mercy or for management purposes. 

They gas rabbits and rip their burrows, shoot and poison foxes, pigs and dogs, and all of this they do with their children – boys and girls – at heel, learning the business of life on the land.

For the record, Ms Cruttenden, exactly how deranged do you believe these children of rural animal killers have grown up to be?

How many of yesterday’s rural youth are crazed killers roaming the streets of Narooma/Dalmeny darkly plotting drive-by shootings and school massacres? Surely if the occasional deer hunt can cause brain damage as you claim, the youth of farming communities, having suffered daily exposure for years on end, must be completely psychotic and know absolutely no restraint whatsoever? 

To the contrary, those children have matured into the responsible adults you rely upon every day – the ambulance officers, doctors and nurses, RFS, SES and VRA volunteers who daily put their lives on the line for the likes of people who routinely insult them in the press. They have grown up to be teachers, mechanics, shop assistants, chefs, police officers, farmers, vets, and all the other folk who make rural communities sustainable.

Moreover, all the antisocial outcomes of “desensitisation to killing animals” you and your pals feign concern about, occur not in rural areas such as ours, but in cities where few children are exposed to the killing of any animal, other than the family dog in the oh-so sanitized setting of an urban veterinary practice, complete with soft lighting and piped music.  The armed robberies, the muggings, the rapes, the murders, the drive-by shootings, the massacres all happen in places where children are insulated from the everyday realities of rural life.

Would you be happier there perhaps?

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.

HUNTFEST: THE SAGA CONCLUDES

HuntFest’s organisers have learned that their Event Licence will be amended at a Eurobodalla Shire Council meeting on Tuesday evening (August 26th, 2014), in a deal stitched up between Eurobodalla Shire Mayor Lindsay Brown and the Eurobodalla Greens. HuntFest’s organisers have received no formal notification about this ambush, but rather heard about it via a Council whistleblower appalled by the ongoing victimisation of the event’s organisers, which is aimed at crippling HuntFest’s volunteer organising committee.

It has been revealed that thanks largely to the Greens and their various guerrilla groups in the community, HuntFest is the most administratively strictured event in the entire Eurobodalla Shire. The proposed amendment to HuntFest’s Event Licence will push the level of bureaucratic red tape beyond that which the event’s volunteer management committee is willing and able to undertake annually.

Greens secure Mayoral support against HuntFest

In a nutshell, the amendments will mean that even the most minor changes to the event plan – for instance, the repositioning of signage – will not be possible without at least a months’ notice and an extensive public consultation process. This is a condition long sought by the Greens, and until now long recognised as totally unreasonable by a majority of Councilors.

The likely result will be the end of HuntFest as a Eurobodalla event, and the loss to the community of the millions of dollars the event attracts to the area annually. Yes, millions of dollars! Though HuntFest is only in its second year, the event attracted an estimated $900.000 to Narooma alone in 2014 and as the event and its reputation grew, so too would the revenue it yielded for the area during its off-season.

It seems, however, that this prosperity is of less importance to the Eurobodalla’s Mayor than the furtherance of his personal political agenda and aspirations.

Sources advise that Lord Mayor Lindsay Brown has indicated that he will “vote with the Greens on Tuesday, regardless of what anyone says!” and this is likely to tip the scales in favour of HuntFest’s opposition within Council’s ranks. It will tip the scales because HuntFest’s usually strong support-base within Council will be diminished due to absences among supportive Councillors at next Tuesday’s meeting.

Hang on a minute....no notice about the proposed amendments.....key Councillors absent from the meeting?  Struth, what a coincidence!

Frankly I’m not sure much can be done to save HuntFest at this point; I suspect the Greens have won. But they have not won, as they will no-doubt attempt to portray it, on the basis of community opposition to the event.

Despite the Greens’ and S.A.F.E’s many statements to the contrary, we know for a fact that opposition to HuntFest amongst the local population is infinitesimally small. This fact has been evidenced time and again by the incredibly poor support enjoyed by anti-HuntFest petitions, public meetings and protests. In fact protests have been so poorly supported that not one of the event protests threatened by the Greens or S.A.F.E has ever materialised.

No, if HuntFest folds, the Greens and S.A.F.E will have won by forging grubby allegiances, by bullying the organisers and the community, and by spreading such offensive lies about the nature of the event and the intentions of its volunteer organisers that they are simply unwilling to continue.

In effect, the Greens and S.A.F.E will have won through battery; through the verbal abuse and bullying of men and women in their community, whose culture and pursuits the Greens don’t approve of. Through basic cultural intolerance!

So what’s next? Fishing perhaps; there is already a strong push against recreational fishing in the Eurobodalla. Perhaps a ban on all 4x4 activities, trail riding, mountain bikes?

If you live in the Eurobodalla and are among the many people who support HuntFest, you have just two years to wait and watch before making your vote count in Council elections, remembering of course that a vote for the current Mayor is a vote for the Greens and against your culture and recreational activities.

If you are not a resident, but rather a regular visitor to the Eurobodalla, now may be the time to begin searching for holiday destinations elsewhere in NSW? Believe it or not, there are holiday destinations that appreciate the contribution your tourist dollars make to a small rural economy. Just look at Bendigo and its annual Wild Deer Hunting & Guiding Expo.

The Bendigo community has embraced this event for many years, with no sign of the many and various catastrophic ill-effects Narooma’s residents have been assured will beset their community if they allow HuntFest to develop. No increase in rapes, murders, or other violent crimes, suicides or domestic violence. No rare native animal species hunted to extinction. No quantum increase in the number of cruel random attacks on wildlife. No mounting list of hapless bushwalkers shot by irresponsible hunters, or random assassinations of moonlight truffle hunters.

In fact the Wild Deer Hunting & Guiding Expo is the biggest event of its kind in the southern hemisphere, and all the revenue commensurate with such an event pours into Bendigo’s economy annually.  

HuntFest was destined to be such an event in Narooma, drawing outdoors-persons to the area from around Australia, but you’d never have known it by the way some Eurobodalla Shire Councillors and crazed extremist minority groups have besieged the event from the outset, on the Greens' behalf.

There is no doubt that some other community will open a goldmine to replace the one Eurobodalla’s short-sighted Council is about to close, but one wonders what plans those who oppose HuntFest have to replace the money it is currently bring to the community in the off-season; vital off-peak income that, based on the experience of towns such as Bendigo, seemed set to grow in years to come?

The cynical Greens and S.A.F.E contrived “Animals in the wild” photographic competition was an act of sabotage organised specifically to damage HuntFest and lobby opposition to it.  Like all preceding protests it was very poorly attended and contributed absolutely nothing to the community’s coffers, as opposed to HuntFest’s $900.000 (2014) contribution. Now that HuntFest has been bushwhacked and bullied into dissolution, will the Greens' photo-competition develop to take HuntFest’s place as a money spinner for Narooma? It seems very unlikely.

So, business people of Narooma, how will you vote at the next Council/Mayoral election? Will you re-elect the Councillors and Mayor who voted money out of your tills at Tuesday night’s Council meeting?

Will you demand that given Council is intent on destroying HuntFest, it outlines plans to replace HuntFest with an alternative festival, organised, financed and managed for free, by volunteers, and not at the ratepayers expense, with all profits ploughed back into the event so as to develop it as an off-peak season event yielding an income to the community during hard times, guaranteed to grow each and every year, as HuntFest has repeatedly proven its potential to do?

Even if the Greens have some yet-to-be unveiled plan to launch a magnificent off-peak alternative to HuntFest, it will take some years to establish, and unlike HuntFest, which was wholly funded by a small local community group, establishment of an alternative event will cost the ratepayer. And haven't the Greens and S.A.F.E already cost the ratepayer dear.

It is a seldom considered fact that the bullying antics of these zealous minority groups have already cost the ratepayer tens of thousands of dollars. For years now Council has been deluged with letters from citizens requiring reassurance after being tricked into totally unwarranted concerns, and by ridiculously weak petitions that take up time at Council meetings that might otherwise be devoted to matters of substance. Letter campaigns have occupied already busy Council staff, as have vexatious complaints about licencing breaches that never took place, and threats of protests that never transpired have cost the community thousands in precautionary security, and has often resulted in precious Police resources being diverted from where they are really needed.

One can only speculate as to the total cost to the ratepayer, just as one can only wonder how many vital projects have been delayed while the Greens and the anti-hunting fraternity indulge their hysteria and petty prejudices. 

Sadly, the hard working men and women behind the scenes at HuntFest appear to have had enough of the constant threats of physical violence against them and their families, the late night threatening phone calls, the damage done to their cars and property, the lies, the slurs against their character, the inveterate bullying and all the other unethical actitivies that have become hallmarks of Greens' community activism. 

And if HuntFest folds the bullies will prance about claiming victory, completely comfortable with the toll their appalling conduct has wrought on the community. As is the case with all zealots, they are incapable of tolerance and completely unconcerned about facts. All they do not approve off must be declared anathema and destroyed, and they are single minded in the pursuit of those ends.

Perhaps this outcome was inevitable? In many ways striving to have a fair and rational debate with the Greens is like playing chess with a pigeon.  It doesn't matter how good you are, at the end of the day the pigeon is just going to knock-over all the pieces, crap on the board and strut about with his chest puffed telling everybody he won.


Anyway, I'll get outaya way now....


If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.

KILLING KENDALL JONES

Oh yes, that nasty Kendall Jones shot the oh-so charismatic creatures in Africa, and because we love those animals so, the only logical thing to do is set-up a snuff page where we can all celebrate our love and respect for Gaia's creation by sharing fantasies about killing a 19 year old cheerleader.

Yeah Team!

Click image to visit the Kill Kendal Jones snuff page

Once again the Anti-Hunters prove in whose souls the hatred, intolerance and evil really dwells. Slag-off at Catholic priests as much as you will, but it is fast becoming evident - and by their own hand - who we should really strive to keep our children safe from.

The FBI and ASIO aught to be tracking the origins of each and every threat posted on this page and each party should be banned from all occupations that deal with children. If these people have children of their own, they should be investigated by authorities to determine if they are teaching their kids that death threats are a responsible way to vent one's opposition to something.

I've said it before and I will keep on saying it...the people who hate guns and hunting, hate them because they have looked into their own souls and found them dark, festering, malignant places, and having made this discovery they fear what they themselves might be capable of if armed.

There are one or two facts that must weigh into the Kendall Jones discussion, if only so that people whose opinions are emoted rather than being formed as a process of intellect, have something to summarily dismiss.

FACT: Hunters of today are not responsible for the plight of threatened and endangered species of today. In fact in many countries hunters provide the principle funding for all wildlife management and recovery efforts.

FACT: In the US, hunters - not green groups nor wildlife foundations - pay for the vast majority of all wildlife conservation efforts.

FACT: Most African nations can ill-afford the cost of animal welfare/conservation/restoration efforts, the funding for which is provided almost exclusively by people like Kendall Jones i.e. hunters.

FACT: People who break the law in order to take animals in the wild are not hunters. They are known as poachers - repeat after me, poachers - and they are reviled by hunters every bit as much as they are hated by the anti-hunting fraternity.

FACT: People who are big on expressing indignation and hatred for trophy hunters are very small on donating money in sufficient quantity to support conservation efforts at the coalface. Left to the emoters, poachers would have pushed many species beyond the point of no return decades ago.

FACT: Many of the charismatic species that are threatened today are in that state, not due to trophy hunters, but rather due to the pressures of local villagers who are apt to kill the animals for their nuisance value. Animals are not hunted in National Parks, but in game reserves, which are also inhabited by people who once routinely killed elephants to prevent them trampling crops, and decimated lions for fear of their children‘s safety.

However, since legal and regulated trophy hunting’s growth in popularity, those same villagers now have an incentive to preserve these animals. Hunting also provides an income through the licensing process (much of which goes directly to villages for community development activities) which allows villagers to develop strategies/infrastructure to keep elephants and lions at bay. In short, the animals now have a value which makes their antics more tolerable, thanks solely to trophy hunting.

FACT: The consumables (meat etc) from trophy hunting activities is dispersed amongst the locals who own the land upon which the animal was taken. It is arrogance and stupidity that assumes that because cat and elephant are not on the menu at your home, they are not traditional fare elsewhere in the world.

FACT: The vast majority of animals taken by trophy hunters are cull animals. For a whole host of reasons, wildlife managers decided that individual animals must be removed from the environment for the good of gene pools or to otherwise increase the productivity of breading programs etc. These animals will die! They can be killed by wildlife managers at a cost to the program, or they can be killed by trophy hunters who pay for the privilege of the hunt and for the animal’s butchering, dispersal, preparation and mounting, all of which means money to the program and local people.

FACT: None of the animals hunted and harvested by Kendal Jones were endangered species.

FACT: The Rhino, which the media claims she shot, was in fact tranquilised so it could receive treatment for injuries sustained during a lion mauling.

FACT: Reports that she shot a cheetah are also false. The cat identified by the media as a cheetah is in fact a leopard. Cheetahs are endangered and therefore not hunted by Kendall or any other responsible hunter.

FACT: The vast majority of people who want to kill Kendall Jones and bring an end to big game hunting, have not, and will never contribute even as much as one thousandth of the funding she has contributed to conservation and community development programs that are making a real difference at the coalface.

FACT: It would be possible to put an end to trophy hunting in Africa tomorrow, and continue and perhaps even enhance conservation and restoration efforts, if only all the people who hate hunters so much would put their money where their oh-so-hateful mouths are and chip in a few thousand dollars each to the many programs that depend, completely, upon the money hunters currently contribute to wildlife conservation.

OPINION: People who think it is appropriate to speak of killing a 19 year-old girl because they do not approve of her culture and hunting activities, are every bit as foul, noxious, filthy, depraved and perverted as rock-spiders and those quaint little people who found personal validation and fulfilment in handing out towels at Auschwitz. 

Anyway, I'll get outaya way now....

Post scriptum: At 15:15 hours today, after a day of heated email communications and phone calls demanding that the snuff page be removed, Facebook finally saw the light of day and pulled it down. How long it will take the author to repost the hate page with a slightly less inflammatory title is anyone's guess, but one can rely on Facebook to tolerate that new page and the evil sentiment expressed on it, just as long as its promoters don't include words like 'kill', 'murder', 'shoot' etc in the title.

If you would like to receive notifications when new posts are uploaded to the Hunters' Stand, send your name and email address to thehunterstand@gmail.com  This service will not include notification of new comments. All information provided will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and discretion.